Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UIORGS-398: modify summary display in organization view mode #575

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 21, 2023

Conversation

alisher-epam
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose

UIORGS-398 - modify summary display in organization view mode

Approach

Screen.Recording.2023-10-17.at.2.02.46.PM.mov

TODOS and Open Questions

Learning

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

  • I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
  • Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
    • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
    • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
    • There are no major code smells or security issues
  • Does this introduce breaking changes?
    • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
    • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

  • What other modules will these changes impact?
  • Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
    • If not, please create them
    • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
    • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
  • Are the JIRAs under active development?
    • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
  • Do PRs exist for these changes?
    • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 17, 2023

BigTest Unit Test Statistics

0 tests  ±0   0 ✔️ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
0 files   ±0   0 ±0 

Results for commit cfc8a9d. ± Comparison against base commit e7ceac4.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 17, 2023

Jest Unit Test Statistics

    1 files  ±0    83 suites  ±0   3m 40s ⏱️ -2s
255 tests +1  255 ✔️ +1  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
258 runs  +1  258 ✔️ +1  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit cfc8a9d. ± Comparison against base commit e7ceac4.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@alisher-epam alisher-epam requested review from usavkov-epam and a team October 17, 2023 09:12
Copy link
Member

@zburke zburke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code LGTM. Please don't forget a CHANGELOG.md entry.

Comment on lines 336 to 350
Boolean(organization.isVendor && organization.isDonor) && (
<Accordion
id={donorContacts}
label={ORGANIZATION_SECTION_LABELS[donorContacts]}
>
{/*
TODO: add donor contacts list component https://issues.folio.org/browse/UIORGS-394
*/}
</Accordion>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Boolean(foo && bar) seems superfluous to me since foo && bar will already evaluate to boolean but 🤷
  • I am not a fan of placeholder stories that insert a broken/empty UI element. Essentially, they add a bug ("accordion is present but has no content"). I guess that's an issue to take up with your PO, but I would strongly prefer UIORGS-398 to be merged after UIORGS-394 was complete.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure. Thank you for your comments.

Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 1 Code Smell

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@alisher-epam alisher-epam merged commit 914862d into master Nov 21, 2023
5 checks passed
@alisher-epam alisher-epam deleted the UIORGS-398 branch November 21, 2023 11:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants